|
Exchanges:The Online Journal of Teaching and Learning in the CSU http://www.exchangesjournal.org Walking a Mile in Their Shoes:
|
|
In California, educators at all levels face the challenge of meeting the needs of English Language Learners (ELLs), whose English proficiency levels and academic needs vary. Recent scholarly literature demonstrates that the public has little knowledge of the natural language acquisition process. Unaware of widely accepted general principles of language acquisition, many wrongly believe that children learn languages quickly and easily; that the more time students spend immersed in a second language setting, the quicker they learn the language; and that there is no difference between social (e.g., conversational language) and academic language (e.g., formal language used in academic settings). Based on our professional experiences in training teachers, we would add to this list yet another misconception held by many teachers: the belief that language-learning issues are irrelevant to content-area teachers. Through our experiences of working with those who teach a student population that is becoming increasingly diverse both linguistically and culturally, we have identified two major issues. Many teachers feel frustrated by their inability to meet the needs of ELLs; we believe that these frustrations are based on their misconceptions associated with the language-learning process. Consequences of these misconceptions may include frustration for the ELLs and teachers, poor classroom performance, and miscommunication between teachers and ELLs. The difficulties associated with the teaching of ELLs are not discipline specific, but apply to everyone involved in the education of students. These educational concerns can be addressed through effective teaching approaches and methods, as well as instructional strategies to help ELLs to conceptualize and understand the instruction and to promote their active class participation. To address the frustrations and concerns expressed by teachers of ELLs, and to better understand and illustrate the learning experiences that ELLs encounter, we, as educators, created an assignment to be used in one of our courses in the Cross-Cultural Language Academic Development (CLAD) certificate program. The CLAD program is situated at the post-baccalaureate level and is designed for both credentialed and pre-service teachers wishing to develop expertise in meeting the needs of linguistically and culturally diverse students. The main objective of the course is to introduce key concepts, issues, and terms concerning the teaching of content-area courses to language minority students in seventh to twelfth grade classes. The course consists of a basic introduction to recent research in language learning theories, an overview of teaching approaches and methods, and instructional strategies for helping ELLs. We wanted to reveal some of the misconceptions teachers have by engaging them in a first-hand experience. These misconceptions became evident through ongoing class discussions. While reading their exams and reflective responses, it became clear to us that the teachers grasped the concepts of language learning theory and practice, but they still lacked an understanding of the ELLs' psychosocial and emotional needs. Therefore, we created an active learning assignment for the teachers in which they would experience a "day in the life" of an ELL. By engaging them in a first-hand experience, we hoped that the teachers would gain empathy and understanding for the psychosocial and emotional needs of ELLs. This project was designed to use television and self-reflection to educate teachers about the strategies and learning processes that ELLs employ daily in classrooms. We wanted teachers to view a foreign-language program that involved human interaction (e.g., soap operas, situation comedies, dramas, etc.) with the intention that they themselves would experience the emotional barriers of being a second-language learner. This would most effectively mirror ELLs' everyday classroom experiences. Teachers were instructed to select a television program in a foreign language in which they were not fluent; the program could not be a foreign film, a sporting event, news, or a program with English subtitles because these programs would be too easy to figure out and lack human interaction. Procedure:
We utilized qualitative research methods to analyze the students' work. The following themes were derived from students' learning journals:
As a result of completing the assignment, the participants came to understand that exposure to a language does not necessarily lead to its acquisition. Through their active participation in this assignment, the students in our course recognized that as teachers, regardless of their discipline, they play a key role in assisting students in English language development. They also realized that the teaching of ELLs is not the sole responsibility of language teachers, but that they too have a responsibility for developing the language skills of ELLs as well as teaching them content knowledge. In addition, perhaps most significantly, the participants developed empathy and understanding toward ELLs' experiences and instructional needs. Through this active learning assignment, the teachers not only shed their misconceptions about language acquisition, but also developed better strategies for educating ELLs. Embedded within the assignment were the general principles of language acquisition, as this was one of the course objectives. We addressed the misconceptions our students had about the language learning process. According to Krashen (1982), language is best acquired when the input is comprehensible (i.e., meaningful, interesting, little beyond current level) and when the learning environment is positive. Through this assignment, teachers actively engaged in their own language learning process and realized their own misconceptions about the principles of language acquisition. In addition, they became more aware of the importance of developing teaching strategies to serve the learning needs of ELLs. The participants' initial reactions to this assignment ranged from feelings of frustration to confusion and discouragement. However, by the conclusion of the project, their attitudes evolved. They wrote in their learning journals that their participation in this assignment proved to be valuable, rewarding, and positive. Without the active-learning assignment, they said, they would not have understood the intimate experience of being an ELL. It allowed them valuable insight into the difficulties faced everyday by ELLs. Teachers also stated that in order to complete the assignment, they needed to enact the language principles and strategies learned in class. They appreciated the opportunity to put theory into practice. Instead of lecturing to the teachers, we engaged them in constructivist learning, therefore enabling them to gain knowledge through active participation and reflective practice. This assignment may be modified and applied to complement other disciplines as well. Suggested Readings and References:Cummins, J. (1994). The role of primary language development in promoting educational successes for language minority students. In C. Leyba (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles: California State University Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center. Krashen, S., Long, M., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-582. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall. McLaughlin, B. (1992). Myth and misconceptions about second language learning: What every teacher needs to unlearn. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Wong Fillmore, L. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 323-346. Posted February 5, 2002 All material appearing in this journal is subject to applicable copyright laws. Publication in this journal in no way indicates the endorsement of the content by the California State University, the Institute for Teaching and Learning, or the Exchanges Editorial Board. ©2002 by Grace Cho and Debra DeCastro-Ambrosetti. |
|
·· exchanges ·· from the classroom ·· top of this article ·· |