ex_CSU_logo.jpg

About this Journal

Call for Papers

Submission
Guidelines

Review Criteria for Research Articles

Calendar of Events &
Opportunities

Exchanges
Editorial Board

Contributors

Post Your Comments

View Readers' Comments
ITL Homepage
Ex_header.jpg
Research ArticlesViewpoints (Position Papers)ReviewsGallery (Creative Works)Ask The Professor
Keehn, Robin - Changing Places— Page 3
Exchanges: The On-line Journal of Teaching and Learning in the CSU


This exercise not only allows students to experience grading their essays, it also enables me to see where we are in agreement or disagreement about the quality of their writing. I inform them that their self-evaluation helps me guide my revision comments because I get a glimpse into how each student sees his or her own writing—its strengths and weaknesses. When I require students to think critically through revisions of their own writing, I invite them to become more independent and more accountable for their written projects.

After I hand out the rubric, go over the criteria, and turn the task over to them, the room becomes very quiet. Frankly, I am still surprised to find that most students invited to participate in and understand the process of criteria-based evaluation take the task so seriously.

I explain to my students that the grading rubric I use is adapted from the scoring guide used by the Education Testing Service for the CSU English Placement Test. I add that over the years I have used a number of scoring guides. And while this one is still in process, I find it offers a clear delineation of the criteria most college instructors are looking for when they grade.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Back to From the Classroom

Back to Exchanges